Aye, cap'n: that's well put. And, in fact, seems reasonable enough to explain other motivations, in other fields. Why would Jerry Brown want a third term as governor of the economic moonscape that is California? I have to believe that on some level, he's spurred by the idea of potential and possibility. Why would Michael Jordan have decided to play for the lowly Wizards, with six titles and a place in Springfield already locked up? Potential, man, and possibility.
And what, I wonder, about parents? No doubt, we're driven to keep going - to keep changing those diapers; to keep dully pointing out red cars and green grass as though we were in a never-ending ESL class - by a range of pressures and rewards. Social expectations play a role - as I learned once when I was chided by a parking meter officer for leaving a sleeping Cleo in the car as I ran 20 feet into an adjacent Starbucks (mea culpa, mea culpa - and please note that your belated disappointment in me is only another example of the phenomenon I'm describing). But so too do the occasional peaks: the sight of Cleo playing with her grandparents, or laughing at the generous antics of cousins, over the Christmas holiday, is a sort of high-octane fuel that keeps this dad, at least, running.
Above all, though, I think that many of us are spurred to parent actively, or creatively, by the very ideas of potential and possibility. Indeed, on New Year's Eve a friend suggested that one compelling reason to have another child would be the possibility that they could solve the world's environmental problems. (True, but contrast the improbability of that lovely idea with the dull certainty that the child would inevitably produce roughly 50 tons of garbage). Or, rather more prosaically, as much as we love our children, we love seeing them grow, as well. And while we can control the direction of that growth to some extent, it's the realization that we can't actually fully control it that's truly exciting.
No comments:
Post a Comment