Saturday, December 5, 2009

Ideals

New parents don't always speak very openly to one another. Sure, they'll occasionally admit that they're not sleeping very much, or they'll voice some uncertainty about whether they should be imposing a stricter schedule, or making the change to solid foods. But generally - and I suppose this blog is just another example of the tendency - they speak in rather rosy tones. The baby's always thriving; things are great; life is good.

Which is is, of course. But every now and then a parent does speak with complete honesty, and it's almost as though a dam has broken. That, at least, is how we felt when a good friend of ours recently expressed some relief that his two small children are now in a day-care program. Really, he noted, they're not very exciting conversational partners. And, he went on, about an hour or an hour a half a day with them is probably enough.

Wow! Was this that rarest of all individuals, one honest enough to call the king naked? Or was he simply (we wondered, like sheep now unsure about why we flock) something less than the ideal parent? Was he saying what we wanted to, but felt we couldn't, or was he saying something that probably shouldn't be said? Or both?

In thinking about this, L. and I didn't really ever answer any of those big questions, but we did try to tackle his implicit question. What is the ideal length of time, per day, with a baby who can't yet talk? Is it, as the saints of motherhood might claim, as much as one can get? Is it whatever the baby seems to need? Or is it, posits Homer S., the time between the football game and the trip to the donut store?

In his A Short Guide to Long Play, Martyn Goff suggests that the perfect length of an overture is between 5 and 10 minutes: such a duration allows a composer to establish a range of ideas without detracting from the body of the piece. Similarly, in his Radio: The Book, Steve Warren argues that the ideal length for a demo, for prospective on-air d.j.s, is between 7 and 10 minutes: enough to give the producers a taste of one's work, but not so much as to seem pretentious. And of course the song most often forwarded as the greatest of all rock tunes, Stairway to Heaven, clocks in at 8 minutes and a second. There's something about an 8-minute span.

Okay - but surely other forms of activity demand other lengths? Well, sure. Take, for instance, an unsigned piece in a 1958 issue of Current Opinion, which wondered what the ideal length of a novel should be, and concluded that many prefer books that take a reader no more than around 4 hours (which meant, in turn, about 35,000 to 40,000 words). Admittedly, the writer added, there are many (including A. Conan Doyle) who say that a successful novel demands a longer form - that a novel, in other words, should last a reader a good 12 or 15 hours, at a minimum. But, he concluded, "under existing conditions, reading, as people are reading, simply for pleasure or recreation, the short novel holds out an undoubted attraction."

I like that phrasing. And I wonder if it could be massaged into a summary of attitudes towards parenting - something like, "under existing conditions, parenting, as people are parenting, for both love and a vast range of other variables, is often attractive if..." If what, though? Well, if they're working Australian dads, I recently learned, they probably spend around three to four hours with their infant. That's pretty generous: another study estimated that Aka fathers (who are nomadic pygmies) only hold their infants for around 10 to 20 minutes per day. Maybe they spend the rest of their day reading long novels by Doyle.

In any event, put L. and me down as comfortably Australian. No offense to Cleo, but we both felt that around 3 to 4 hours of one-on-one time with her, per day, might be ideal. Which, when you realize that Cleo still sleeps for roughly 14 hours per day, works pretty well. Add in a little bit of full-family time, and there's a complete 24-hour day, with no hard feelings. But also, we might add, with little time to perfect that d.j. demo we've been working on...

1 comment:

  1. Perhaps it depends on ones perspective, whether or not there are older children in the family and what happened with them, the developmental needs of the particular parent, the work hours/responsibilities of the parent/parents, among other things. It isn't the baby's responsibility to entertain nor to keep one engaged, and if we wait for meaningful conversation we will probably have quite a long wait. In the meantime, we may be missing those growth spurts which Cleo is experiencing. Think of how different she is now from how she was in June! There is only one first time for any of us, and they can't be scheduled for the convenience of a father's one hour daily. Nor, to be fair, to the whole days a stay-at-home Mom or Dad is present. If you saw "Erin Brockovich" you might remember the poignant (to me) scene where she is talking on her cell phone to the baby sitter/boyfriend, and he tells her that the baby spoke her first word - "ball" - and how amazing it was. Not something I would have wanted to miss, and it's clear that Erin didn't, either.

    The professionals tell us that a baby's "play" and seemingly aimless behavior is really a baby's work,
    and we see the results of that work when the infant sits up and turns over and crawls and reaches for a favorite object. Part of that work is learning how to increase the attention span, which will lead to the ability to tolerate the absence of the significant care-giver; and to the ability to amuse oneself, an increasingly endangered skill among our over-scheduled and expect-to-be-entertained children. In the end, parents need to make choices which fit their own particular situations, considering what is best for the child, what is best for oneself, what is best for ones partner, and what is best for the family. In a perfect world, those "bests" will come out even.

    ReplyDelete